ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Sensory Analyses Driven Formulation of Fruit Cereal Bars Enriched With
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cereal bars represent a fast source of nutrients and energy, instrumental in enlarging the functional foods market. Among the different bioactive components, Arthrospira platensis (spirulina) has gained great interest for application in functional food, thanks to its pigment phycocyanin, a high-value protein, with antioxidant properties. The bar's nutritional composition was planned to produce enriched fruit cereal bars with an increased protein content of up to 10%, with a 2% spirulina addition. Bars were prepared by mixing sugars, honey, puffed wheat, and dried fruits (candied orange and lemon, peanuts, and almonds) at 130°C. Finally, different concentrations of spirulina powder (0.2%, 1.0%, and 2.0%) were added by mixing with heating off. Sensory evaluation was conducted by a trained panel on the enriched bars at three different spirulina concentrations. Tests included Descriptive Analysis (DA), Check-All-That-Apply questionnaire (CATA), and Temporal Dominance of Sensations (TDS). Sensory analysis indicated that olfactory and flavor notes were essentially red fruits, raisins, and toasted and spicy odor at all spirulina concentrations, without any trace of off-odors or -flavors. In the 0.2% spirulina bar the attribute "citrus" was dominant during the whole taste analysis, while 1% and 2% bars showed the dominance of "red and dried fruit" flavors. Enriched fruit cereal bars with spirulina up to 2% showed increased levels of a high-value protein, without inducing undesirable changes in sensory parameters. These are encouraging data for successful spirulina-supplemented functional foods production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.