Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291903›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Head-to-head comparison of

Biyao Hu, Haonan Yu, Meijie Pan, Hailei Yang, Xiling Xing, Dong Li, Shaobo Yao, Qiusong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Biyao Hu *Department of PET/CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging & Tianjin Institute of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Haonan Yu *Department of PET/CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging & Tianjin Institute of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Meijie Pan *Department of PET/CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging & Tianjin Institute of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Hailei YangDepartment of PET/CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging & Tianjin Institute of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiling XingDepartment of PET/CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging & Tianjin Institute of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Dong LiDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shaobo YaoDepartment of PET/CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging & Tianjin Institute of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Qiusong ChenDepartment of PET/CT Diagnostic, Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging & Tianjin Institute of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Delayed PET/CT imaging with Methods: Between 2019 and 2024, 65 PCa patients who underwent early (1 h post-injection) and delayed (3 h p.i.) PSMA and FDG scans were retrospectively analyzed. The delayed scans were conducted to clarify unclear findings in early scans or to increase the tumor lesions uptake in negative early scans. All patients were asked to drink 1 L of water between early and delayed scans. The number of primary and metastatic lesions, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, lesions changes in SUV Results: Overall, 83 and 84 lesions characteristic for PCa in 65 patients clearly presented at 1 h and 3 h p.i. in PSMA scans, respectively. 30 and 45 lesions characteristic for PCa in 65 patients clearly presented at 1 h and 3 h p.i. in FDG scans. The 3-hour delayed imaging of FDG found more primary foci than 1-hour imaging but was much less able to detect metastatic foci than PSMA. PSMA was more sensitive than FDG in delayed imaging (96.15% vs. 84.21%), and the diagnostic accuracy for primary foci was higher for PSMA than FDG in delayed imaging (83.87% vs. 73.91%). However, FDG delayed imaging greatly improved the diagnostic accuracy for primary PCa compared to early imaging (73.91% vs.53.33%). PSMA SUV Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT at 3 h p.i. detected the most lesions characteristic of primary PCa, and it showed higher uptake and contrast than FDG. However, to some extent, FDG delayed PET/CT imaging is still important in primary PCa diagnosis, particularly in hospitals without PSMA.

Indexed as

18F-FDG68Ga-PSMA-11delayed imagingPET/CTprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID40291903
PMCPMC12021635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.