Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291845›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Arachnoid fibrosis in the cerebellopontine angle of primary trigeminal neuralgia: a histopathological study.

Siqiang Tang, Mufang Huang, Jiajie Wu, Yexin Li, Kaiyuan Jiang, Peng Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Siqiang TangThe Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang, China.
Mufang HuangThe Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang, China.
Jiajie WuThe Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang, China.
Yexin LiThe Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang, China.
Kaiyuan JiangThe Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang, China.
Peng DengThe Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate differences in the arachnoid membrane of the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) cistern between patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and trauma patients without TN, providing novel insights into the pathogenesis of TN. Methods: Arachnoid specimens were collected from patients with primary TN undergoing their first microvascular decompression at the Neurosurgery Department of Shaoyang Central Hospital between January 2021 and September 2024 (study group) and from patients with posterior cranial fossa trauma undergoing surgery during the same period (normal control group). Specimens from both groups were subjected to hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and picric acid-Sirius red staining. Morphological thickness and collagen fiber thickness in the arachnoid membrane were measured under polarized light microscopy and then compared and statistically analyzed. Results: The study included 41 patients with primary TN and 38 normal control subjects. In the TN group, the mean thickness of the entire arachnoid layer in the CPA cistern was 87.86 ± 9.34 μm, and the mean thickness of collagen fibers was 53.95 ± 8.90 μm. In the control group, these values were 62.55 ± 1.55 μm and 33.50 ± 3.60 μm, respectively. The differences in both arachnoid thickness ( Conclusion: Patients with TN exhibited significant arachnoid fibrosis and thickening in the CPA cistern, primarily due to an increase in collagen fibers. These findings suggested a potential pathological mechanism underlying TN.

Indexed as

arachnoid fibrosiscerebellar pontine horn cisternamicrovascular decompressionprimary trigeminal neuralgiaSirius red staining

Identifiers

PMID40291845
PMCPMC12021613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.