Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291833›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025

Drivers of Food Decision Making and Aspirations for the Future of the School Food Environment among Junior High School Students in Cape Coast, Ghana: a Photovoice Study.

Elise C Reynolds, Christiana Nsiah-Asamoah, Harriet Okronipa, Nicholas F Russell, Madina Habib, Christine P Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elise C ReynoldsInstitute for Global Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.
Christiana Nsiah-AsamoahDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Harriet OkronipaDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.
Nicholas F RussellInstitute for Global Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.
Madina HabibDepartment of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Christine P StewartInstitute for Global Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.

Funding

University of California Launching Future Leaders in Global Health Research Training ProgramD43TW009343 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRAIG R COHEN, Sung-Jae Lee · 2017 to 2026
$14.7M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Food decision making is a complex and dynamic process that influences diet and ultimately health. Adolescents consider many different food environment-level factors when making decisions about food. These factors may vary by context. Adolescents attending junior high school (JHS) in Ghana frequently interact with their school food environments because they do not have access to a national school meal program. Objectives: The objective of this study was to understand the factors that influence adolescent food-related decisions and how adolescents interact with their school food environments from their own perspectives. Secondarily, we sought to elicit adolescent ideas for the future of their school food environment. Methods: Forty adolescents were purposively selected equally across 4 JHSs in Cape Coast, Ghana. We used Photovoice to elicit photographs and ideas across 5 workshops with each school. Adolescents were provided with digital cameras and weekly photography prompts followed by semistructured group discussions each week. We thematically analyzed photographs and discussions with input from the adolescents. Adolescents presented their findings to local stakeholders through a photograph exhibition at the end of the study. Results: Adolescents reported factors influencing their food decisions at the policy, environmental, interpersonal, and individual levels, mirroring the socioecological model. These factors included school policies (30 coded references), food hygiene and safety (374), food availability (83), relationships with vendors (62), peer influence (36), nutritional value (42), taste (41), satiety (25), appearance (30), and affordability (160), with hygiene, safety, and affordability being most frequently mentioned. Adolescents wanted to be involved in decisions around their school food environments. Conclusions: Adolescent food decision making in this context is often driven by food hygiene and safety and affordability. Supporting adolescent autonomy for food-related decisions and including them in decision making to change school food environments could empower adolescents in their food decisions and improve school food environments to match with adolescents' needs and desires.

Indexed as

adolescentfood choicefood environmentschool nutrition

Identifiers

PMID40291833
PMCPMC12033901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.