ArticleFrontiers in big data2025
Lightweight and hybrid transformer-based solution for quick and reliable deepfake detection.
Article in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and generative artificial intelligence have enabled the creation of fake images and videos that appear highly realistic. According to a report published in 2022, approximately 71% of people rely on fake videos and become victims of blackmail. Moreover, these fake videos and images are used to tarnish the reputation of popular public figures. This has increased the demand for deepfake detection techniques. The accuracy of the techniques proposed in the literature so far varies with changes in fake content generation techniques. Additionally, these techniques are computationally intensive. The techniques discussed in the literature are based on convolutional neural networks, Linformer models, or transformer models for deepfake detection, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Methods: In this manuscript, a hybrid architecture combining transformer and Linformer models is proposed for deepfake detection. This architecture converts an image into patches and performs position encoding to retain spatial relationships between patches. Its encoder captures the contextual information from the input patches, and Gaussian Error Linear Unit resolves the vanishing gradient problem. Results: The Linformer component reduces the size of the attention matrix. Thus, it reduces the execution time to half without compromising accuracy. Moreover, it utilizes the unique features of transformer and Linformer models to enhance the robustness and generalization of deepfake detection techniques. The low computational requirement and high accuracy of 98.9% increase the real-time applicability of the model, preventing blackmail and other losses to the public. Discussion: The proposed hybrid model utilizes the strength of the transformer model in capturing complex patterns in data. It uses the self-attention potential of the Linformer model and reduces the computation time without compromising the accuracy. Moreover, the models were implemented on patch sizes of 6 and 11. It is evident from the obtained results that increasing the patch size improves the performance of the model. This allows the model to capture fine-grained features and learn more effectively from the same set of videos. The larger patch size also enables the model to better preserve spatial details, which contributes to improved feature extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.