ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular and Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer-Surgical Technique and Outcomes of a Single-surgeon Series.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical distribution and predictors of lymph node metastasis in robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter study by the Junior ERUS/YAU Robotic Surgery Working Group.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer: state of the art and future perspectives.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Lymph Node Dissection for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Critical Appraisal of Lymph Node Mapping Studies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Extraperitoneal Single-Port Robot-Assisted Bilateral Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dis-section for Primary Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumor: Technique and Surgical Considerations.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is essential in managing testicular and upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). While open RPLND remains the gold standard, robot-assisted RPLND (RA-RPLND) is gaining traction in selected cases. This study aims to describe the surgical technique and our experience with RA-RPLND, and to demonstrate the peri-and postoperative safety and efficacy of this approach for the treatment of testicular cancer and UTUC. Methods: We analyzed the data from a single-surgeon series of 96 patients (64 testicular cancer and 32 UTUC) who underwent RA-RPLND between 2016 and 2024. The procedures included left ( Key findings and limitations: Median length of stay was 1 (IQR 1-1) d for testicular cancer and 2.5 (IQR 2-4) d for UTUC patients. Open conversion occurred in two testicular cancer salvage cases. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3a) occurred in 9% (testicular cancer) and 13% (UTUC) of patients. Two patients died within 90 d after RA-RPLND for UTUC: one due to an acute myocardial infarction and the other due to progressive disease. Six patients (19%) with UTUC died due to progressive disease within a median follow-up of 38 (range 4-66) mo, whereas all patients with testicular cancer were still alive after a median follow-up of 46 (range 1-97) mo. Overall and cancer-specific survival rates at the end of follow-up were 78% and 69% in patients with UTUC, and 100% and 100% in patients with testicular cancer, respectively. No retroperitoneal recurrences occurred in either cohort until the end of follow-up. Limitations include the steep learning curve and nonreproducibility by surgeons without expertise in advanced robotic surgery. Conclusions and clinical implications: RA-RPLND remains a technically challenging operation, but is safe and effective in expert hands and should therefore be considered for selected patients in high-volume centers. Patient summary: In this study, we examined the outcomes after robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. We conclude that it is a safe and effective procedure for patients with testicular cancer and cancer of the renal pelvis and ureter when performed by experienced surgeons. Therefore, it can be a suitable choice for certain patients, depending on their individual circumstances. Patients should also be given detailed instructions about what to expect after surgery, including how to take care of themselves at home to promote recovery and stay safe after being discharged from the hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.