ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2025
Atypical adverse events in a real-world study of long-term immunomodulation for multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immunotherapies are integral in managing multiple sclerosis (MS) and related demyelinating diseases, but adverse drug reactions significantly affect the tolerability of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Objectives: This study aims to assess the safety profile of DMTs within a real-world cohort affected by MS and related diseases and to identify atypical adverse events (AEs) and those of exceptional severity. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 3850 patients with MS, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and related conditions (2009-2022). Demographic and clinical data were analyzed for patients treated with DMTs. Parameters included prior treatments, AEs, treatment durations, and reasons for discontinuation. Results: Of the cohort, 1989 patients (71.1% female) with a median follow-up of 46.3 months during DMT use were included. Monotherapy was employed in 987 patients, while 1002 received sequential DMTs, totaling 3850 treatments. Adverse reactions led to discontinuation in 24.2% of cases, while disease progression accounted for 22.9%. Among 1878 AEs, 31 (1.7%) were atypical, and 59 (3.1%) were unusually severe, which was systematically categorized based on type, timing, and remission. Conclusion: Within the confines of this real-world study, DMT administration emerged as generally well tolerated in MS, related demyelinating diseases and NMOSD. The identification of a limited number of atypical AEs, nevertheless, broadens the spectrum of potential complications associated with DMTs. Although weaker evidence for causal associations between drug exposure and observed AEs remains a limitation in observational studies without comparable control groups, this study underscores the value of real-world investigations in offering insights into the long-term safety of DMTs, particularly for rare events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.