Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291751›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

SPAC: a scalable, integrated enterprise platform for end-to-end single cell spatial analysis of multiplexed tissue imaging.

Fang Liu, Rui He, Thomas Sheeley, David Scheiblin, Stephen J Lockett, Lisa A Ridnour, David A Wink, Mark Jensen, Janelle Cortner, George Zaki

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fang LiuBiomedical and Computational Science Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Rockville, MD, USA.
Rui HeEssential Software Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Thomas SheeleyDepartment of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
David ScheiblinOptical Microscopy and Analysis Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research; Leidos Biomedical Research Inc. for the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
Stephen J LockettOptical Microscopy and Analysis Laboratory, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research; Leidos Biomedical Research Inc. for the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA.
Lisa A RidnourCancer Innovation Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA.
David A WinkCancer Innovation Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA.
Mark JensenBiomedical and Computational Science Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Rockville, MD, USA.
Janelle CortnerCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
George ZakiBiomedical and Computational Science Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Rockville, MD, USA.

Funding

WORK ORDER 126643 B539 EXPAND IC SUITE75N91019D00024 · NIAID · LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. · PI PENDLETON, RICHARD · 2019 to 2025
$3932.6M
Transgenic Mouse Core Facility Shared Resource (TMCF-SR)P30CA023168 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI John Tesmer · 1985 to 2026
$43.4M
NCI NIH HHS 75N91019D00024NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiplexed tissue imaging enables the simultaneous detection of dozens of proteins at single-cell resolution, providing unprecedented insights into tissue organization and disease microenvironments. However, the resulting high-dimensional, gigabyte-scale datasets pose significant computational and methodological challenges. Existing analytical workflows, often fragmented between bespoke scripts and static visualizations, lack the scalability and user-friendly interfaces required for efficient, reproducible analysis. To overcome these limitations, we developed SPAC (analysis of SPAtial single-Cell datasets), a scalable, web-based ecosystem that integrates modular pipelines, high-performance computing (HPC) connectivity, and interactive visualization to democratize end-to-end single-cell spatial analysis applied to cellular positional data and protein expression levels. Results: SPAC is built on a modular, layered architecture that leverages community-based and newly developed tools for single-cell and spatial proteomics analysis. A specialized Python package extends these functionalities with custom analysis routines and established software engineering practices. An Interactive Analysis Layer provides web-hosted pipelines for configuring and executing complex workflows, and scalability enhancements that support distributed or parallel execution on GPU-enabled clusters. A Real-Time Visualization Layer delivers dynamic dashboards for immediate data exploration and sharing. As a showcase of its capabilities, SPAC was applied to a 4T1 breast cancer model, analyzing a multiplex imaging dataset comprising 2.6 million cells. GPU acceleration reduced unsupervised clustering runtimes from several hours to under ten minutes, and real-time visualization enabled detailed spatial characterization of tumor subregions. Conclusions: SPAC effectively overcomes key challenges in spatial single-cell analysis by streamlining high-throughput data processing and spatial profiling within an accessible and scalable framework. Its robust architecture, interactive interface and ease of access have the potential to accelerate biomedical research and clinical applications by converting complex imaging data into actionable biological and clinical insights.

Indexed as

high-performance computinginteractive visualizationmultiplex imagingscalable analysissingle-cell analysisSpatial proteomicstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40291751
PMCPMC12026498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.