Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291715›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Conserved energetic changes drive function in an ancient protein fold.

Malcolm L Wells, Chenlin Lu, Daniel Sultanov, Kyle C Weber, Zhen Gong, Anum Glasgow

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Malcolm L WellsDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-0746-1982
Chenlin LuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5655-2993
Daniel SultanovDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2323-9412
Kyle C WeberDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3379-6303
Zhen GongDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0760-1493
Anum GlasgowDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0938-881X

Funding

Training in Cellular, Molecular and Biomedical Studies (CMBS)T32GM145766 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Rebecca Anne Haeusler, RONALD K. LIEM · 2022 to 2026
$4.1M
Mapping and rewiring protein allosteryR00GM135529 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GLASGOW, ANUM AZAM · 2022 to 2024
$747k
Computationally designed, small molecule-responsive cell receptors for treating solid tumorsR21EB035208 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Anum Azam Glasgow · 2024 to 2026
$640k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB035208NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM135529NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many protein sequences occupy similar three-dimensional structures known as protein folds. In nature, protein folds are well-conserved over the course of evolution, such that there are 100,000 times as many extant protein sequences than there are folds. Despite their common shapes, similar protein folds can adopt wide-ranging functions, raising the question: are protein folds so strongly conserved for the purpose of maintaining function-driving energetic changes in protein families? Here we show that a set of key energetic relationships in a family of bacterial transcription factors (TFs) is conserved using high-resolution hydrogen exchange/mass spectrometry, bioinformatics, X-ray crystallography, and molecular dynamics simulations. We compared the TFs to their anciently diverged structural homologs, the periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs), expecting that protein families that share the same fold and bind the same sugars would have similar energetic responses. Surprisingly, our findings reveal the opposite: the "energetic blueprints" of the PBPs and the TFs are largely distinct, with the allosteric network of the TFs evolving specifically to support the functional requirements of genome regulation, versus conserved interactions with membrane transport machinery in PBPs. These results demonstrate how the same fold can be adapted for different sense/response functions via family-specific energetic requirements - even when responding to the same chemical trigger. Understanding the evolutionarily conserved energetic blueprint for a protein family provides a roadmap for designing functional proteins

Identifiers

PMID40291715
PMCPMC12026503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.