Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291671›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Chemical representation standardization needed to generalize metabolic pathway involvement prediction across the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Reactome, and MetaCyc knowledgebases.

Erik D Huckvale, Hunter N B Moseley

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erik D HuckvaleMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6994-8831
Hunter N B MoseleyMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3995-5368

Funding

Vascular Mechanisms of PCB-Induced Brain MetastasesP42ES007380 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI MORRIS, ANDREW J · 1997 to 2024
$47.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES007380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Due to the utility of knowing the pathway involvement of compounds detected in biological experiments, knowledgebases such as the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Reactome, and MetaCyc have aggregated pathway annotations of compounds. However, these annotations are largely incomplete and are costly to obtain experimentally and curate from published scientific literature. Results: We constructed a new dataset using compounds and their pathway annotations from KEGG, Reactome, and MetaCyc. Using this dataset, we trained and tested an extreme classification model that classifies 8,195 unique pathways based on compound chemical representations with a mean Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.9036 ± 0.0033. During model evaluation, we discovered an inconsistency in chemical representations across knowledgebases, which was alleviated by standardizing the chemical representations using InChI (IUPAC International Chemical Identifier) canonicalization. Next, we compared the MCC between compounds and their cross-knowledgebase references. The non-standardized chemical representations had a huge 0.2687 drop in MCC while the standardized chemical representations only had a 0.0384 drop in MCC. Thus, standardizing chemical representation is an essential step when predicting on novel chemical representations. Availability and implementation: All code and data for reproducing the results of this manuscript are available in the following figshare items:Manuscript main results: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28701845CV analysis of model and dataset of prior studies: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28701590.

Identifiers

PMID40291671
PMCPMC12026579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.