Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291633›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Precision Rehabilitation After Youth Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Individualized Reinjury Risk Stratification and Modifiable Risk Factor Identification to Guide Late-Phase Rehabilitation.

Elliot M Greenberg, Amanda Watson, Kimberly Helm, Kevin Landrum, J Todd R Lawrence, Theodore J Ganley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elliot M GreenbergDivision of Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2167-1535
Amanda WatsonSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6148-5847
Kimberly HelmSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kevin LandrumDivision of Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Todd R LawrenceDivision of Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Theodore J GanleyDivision of Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, adolescent athletes have a high risk of second ACL injuries, and revision ACL reconstruction is associated with increased medical costs, reduced activity levels, chronic knee pain, and higher rates of knee osteoarthritis, making the prevention of a reinjury a priority. While athlete clearance protocols and algorithms exist, the current methods of identifying the reinjury risk have limited predictive accuracy and are largely based on nonmodifiable risk factors, which limit their clinical application. Purpose: The goal of this study was to develop an ACL reinjury risk prediction (ACL-RRP) model capable of accurately classifying an individual patient's risk, identifying modifiable risk factors, and ranking these factors in the order of importance and ability to be modified. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A clinician-informed approach was utilized to develop the prediction model and an interpretable output system. The primary outcome variable was the likelihood of sustaining a repeat ACL injury. The data were split into training (80% [n = 628]) and holdout (20% [n = 158]) datasets to train and subsequently validate the model. The accuracy of classification was identified by the sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values, and odds ratio. Results: The final model included 33 predictor variables, 23 of which are modifiable. The model adjusted the weight of the risk classification and risk factors (predictor variables) on a case-by-case basis. The model demonstrated a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 76%. Patients classified as being high risk had 4.5 times the risk of repeat ACL injuries compared with those classified as being low risk. Conclusion: This clinician-informed ACL-RRP model demonstrated a high degree of accuracy when classifying patients as having a high or low risk of repeat ACL injuries and generated patient-specific modifiable risk factors to guide ongoing rehabilitation or patient education to achieve the goals of reducing the ACL reinjury risk.

Indexed as

adolescentanterior cruciate ligamentmachine learningpediatricrehabilitationreinjury

Identifiers

PMID40291633
PMCPMC12032490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.