ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Precision Rehabilitation After Youth Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Individualized Reinjury Risk Stratification and Modifiable Risk Factor Identification to Guide Late-Phase Rehabilitation.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI Evaluation of Graft Remodeling After Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients: A 5-Year Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Development of machine learning models for preoperative prediction of insufficient clinical improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, adolescent athletes have a high risk of second ACL injuries, and revision ACL reconstruction is associated with increased medical costs, reduced activity levels, chronic knee pain, and higher rates of knee osteoarthritis, making the prevention of a reinjury a priority. While athlete clearance protocols and algorithms exist, the current methods of identifying the reinjury risk have limited predictive accuracy and are largely based on nonmodifiable risk factors, which limit their clinical application. Purpose: The goal of this study was to develop an ACL reinjury risk prediction (ACL-RRP) model capable of accurately classifying an individual patient's risk, identifying modifiable risk factors, and ranking these factors in the order of importance and ability to be modified. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A clinician-informed approach was utilized to develop the prediction model and an interpretable output system. The primary outcome variable was the likelihood of sustaining a repeat ACL injury. The data were split into training (80% [n = 628]) and holdout (20% [n = 158]) datasets to train and subsequently validate the model. The accuracy of classification was identified by the sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values, and odds ratio. Results: The final model included 33 predictor variables, 23 of which are modifiable. The model adjusted the weight of the risk classification and risk factors (predictor variables) on a case-by-case basis. The model demonstrated a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 76%. Patients classified as being high risk had 4.5 times the risk of repeat ACL injuries compared with those classified as being low risk. Conclusion: This clinician-informed ACL-RRP model demonstrated a high degree of accuracy when classifying patients as having a high or low risk of repeat ACL injuries and generated patient-specific modifiable risk factors to guide ongoing rehabilitation or patient education to achieve the goals of reducing the ACL reinjury risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.