ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Comparative outcomes of kinematically aligned TKA with medial stabilized design vs. mechanically aligned TKA with bi-cruciate stabilized design: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The influence of CPAK classification on the pivot motion between kinematic and mechanical alignment total knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Patient dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often linked to altered knee kinematics and stability. This study compared the short-term clinical outcomes of kinematically aligned TKA (KA-TKA) and mechanically aligned TKA (MA-TKA) using bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) implants. Methods: In this propensity score-matched study, 60 patients who underwent either KA-TKA or MA-TKA (30 per group) with BCS implants were analyzed. Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, preoperative range of motion (ROM), and hip-knee-ankle alignment, were matched. ROM and clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively using the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) subscales and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS). Results: At 1 year, the KA group achieved higher scores in KSS subscales for symptoms (23.2 vs. 20.0, Conclusions: KA-TKA demonstrated superior satisfaction and functional recovery than MA-TKA with BCS implants in the short term. These results suggested that KA-TKA, which reconstructs patient-specific alignment, may provide a more natural knee feel, leading to higher patient satisfaction compared to implant-driven BCS-TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.