ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Organ donation under V-A ECMO support: insights and recommendations from Japan's first two cases.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) has expanded globally as a life-saving intervention of cardiac arrest. However, brain death following successful resuscitation presents unique clinical and procedural challenges, particularly in apnea testing, electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring, and organ donation. Despite increasing international adoption of ECMO, standardized protocol for brain death determination under ECMO remain limited. Methods: This study describes Japan's first two cases of legal brain death determination and organ donation under V-A ECMO support, conducted in accordance with Japan's legal standards. Each case was managed through close multidisciplinary collaboration and tailored clinical planning. Key procedural challenges were addressed, including adaptation of apnea testing via controlled sweep gas flow reduction, minimization of EEG artifacts through strategic technical adjustments, and intraoperative planning to ensure stable organ perfusion. Based on these experiences, we developed an institutional protocol to support safe and standardized brain death determination and organ retrieval under ECMO. Results: Both cases were successfully completed without significant complications, offering valuable insights into ECMO-assisted organ donation. Key considerations included optimizing sweep gas flow to achieve PaCO Conclusion: This study suggests that brain death organ donation under ECMO can be performed under specific conditions, even in countries where its adoption has been limited. Establishing a safe and standardized determination process may enhance organ donation and expand the pool of transplantable organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.