ArticleAJP reports2025
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Sjogren's Disease Compared to Controls: An Interdisciplinary Approach with Maternal-Fetal Medicine.
Article in AJP reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Outside of the association of SS-A antibody with congenital heart block, little is known about adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, in patients with Sjogren's disease (SjD). Our study involved collaboration with maternal-fetal medicine (MFM). Methods: A retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients: SjD patients were matched 1:3 with non-SjD controls. SjD patients were included by meeting the 2016 ACR/EULAR Criteria or by a rheumatologist diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were concurrent autoimmune disease or related antibodies. A composite of grouped outcomes was utilized and verified by MFM specialists. The primary outcome was adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sample Results: 48 patients were included: 12 SjD patients and 36 controls. APO was significantly increased in SjD with one preterm birth, one fetal growth restriction, and one limb anomaly; non-SjD had one cardiac anomaly. There were no cases of CHB. SjD patients were more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery. Conclusion: There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls. No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found. We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology and future studies should be performed. Key Points: There was an increased risk of APO in SjD patients compared with controls.No significant difference in neonatal outcomes was found.We speculate that placental pathology may play a role in pathophysiology, prompting future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.