ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025
Precision
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhaeochromocytoma and paragangliomas (PPGL) are rare neuroendocrine tumors usually caused by parasympathetic or sympathetic nerves, with an overall incidence of approximately 0.66 cases per 100000 people per year. Most PPGLs are asymptomatic, and a few develop symptoms, such as elevated blood pressure and rapid heart rate, because of the release of catecholamines. According to the literature, surgical resection is the mainstay of PPGL treatment. However, the choice between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery remains controversial, particularly in cases involving complex anatomical relationships. We successfully resected a tumor located between the inferior vena cava and abdominal aorta using a minimally invasive approach with the assistance of computed tomography (CT) angiography and three-dimensional reconstruction, resulting in a favorable outcome. CASE SUMMARY: A 56-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with right upper abdominal discomfort for more than 6 months, experiencing occasional pins and needles sensation and radiation from the right shoulder and back. Prehospital CT of the upper abdomen revealed a retroperitoneal mass suspected to be a retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma. Surgery was recommended, and an enhanced CT scan of the upper abdomen, along with preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction, was performed after admission. The imaging indicated that the mass, measuring approximately 4.1 cm × 3.8 cm × 4.8 cm, was situated between the abdominal aorta and the inferior vena cava, extending downward to the level of the left renal vein. After ruling out any contraindications to surgery, a minimally invasive laparoscopy was performed to excise the mass precisely. The surgery was successful without any postoperative complications, and the 2-month follow-up revealed no abnormal signs of recurrence.
conclusionThis case report describes successful and precise laparoscopic resection of a retroperitoneal tumor. The patient recovered well during the 2-month follow-up, and postoperative pathology revealed a paraganglioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.