ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Muscular responses to upper body mediolateral angular momentum perturbations during overground walking.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphology and control roles in perturbed standing recovery: a robotic study.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- Humans self-organise balance control strategies on a dynamic platform.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adaptive motor control and seamless coordination of muscle actions in response to external perturbations are crucial to maintaining balance during bipedal locomotion. There is an ongoing debate about the specific roles of individual muscles and underlying neural control circuitry that humans employ to maintain balance in different perturbation scenarios. To advance our understanding of human motor control in perturbation recovery, we conducted a study using a portable Angular Momentum Perturbator (AMP). Unlike other push/pull perturbation systems, the AMP can generate perturbation torques on the upper body while minimizing the perturbing forces at the center of mass. In this study, ten participants experienced trunk perturbations during either the mid-stance or touchdown phase in two frontal plane directions (ipsilateral and contralateral). We recorded and analyzed the electromyography (EMG) activity of eight lower-limb muscles from both legs to examine muscular responses in different phases and directions. Based on our findings, individuals primarily employ long-latency hip strategies to effectively counteract perturbation torques, with the occasional use of ankle strategies. Furthermore, it was found that proximal muscles, particularly the biarticular Rectus Femoris, consistently exhibited higher activation levels than other muscles. Additionally, in instances where a statistically significant difference was noted, we observed that the fastest reactions generally stem from muscles in close proximity to the perturbation site. However, the temporal sequence of muscles' activation depends on the timing and direction of the perturbation. These findings enhance reflex response modeling, aiding the development of simulation tools for accurately predicting exogenous disturbances. Additionally, they hold the potential to shape the development of assistive devices, with implications for clinical interventions, particularly for the elderly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.