ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science
Modified Early Warning Score scores in the emergency department: Factors associated with changing scores to evaluate clinical improvement or deterioration.
Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the acute care chain, a heterogeneous group of patients seeks medical attention, of whom a small proportion become critically ill. Prediction models, such as the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), may assist in the identification of these patients and thereby prevent serious adverse events. The delta score within the emergency room (emergency department [ED]) is associated with outcome. However, it is unknown which factors contribute to these changes in MEWS scores. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study at the Amsterdam University Medical Center, which included adult patients presented to the ED by ambulance from March 2022 to October 2022. We collected MEWS at ambulance arrival and 3 h after ED admission, as well as information about diagnostic tests, therapy, and interventions. Our primary outcome was the association of patients' characteristics and acute care actions (diagnostics, therapy, and interventions) with changes in the MEWS score. Results: A total of 261 patients were included. A higher MEWS at presentation with subsequent improvement was related to better outcomes and they received more therapeutic interventions and the administration of therapy, although these results may have been biased by the need for oxygen supply in respiratory unstable patients. In comparison with patients with normal and stable MEWS scores, they received overall less therapy. Conclusion: MEWS could be used to predict short-term critical illness in patients presenting to the ED. Further research is needed to evaluate the association of the acute care chains' performance and changes in MEWS scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.