ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Intelligent detection for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): Taxonomy, datasets and detection tools.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting polycystic metabolic ovarian syndrome heterogeneity (PMOS): multi-omics, AI subtyping, and precision management.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Balancing metabolic optimization and reproductive safety in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Bayesian-informed framework for GLP-1 receptor agonists.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Intelligent detection for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): Taxonomy, datasets and detection tools.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- A sustainable public health framework for PCOS management in low- and middle-income countries: a narrative review.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent research on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) detection increasingly employs intelligent algorithms to assist gynecologists in more accurate and efficient diagnoses. However, intelligent PCOS detection faces notable challenges: absence of standardized feature taxonomies, limited research on available datasets, and insufficient understanding of existing detection tools' capabilities. This paper addresses these gaps by introducing a novel analytical framework for PCOS diagnostic research and developing a comprehensive taxonomy comprising 108 features across 8 categories. Furthermore, we analyzed available datasets and assessed current intelligent detection tools. Our findings reveal that 12 publicly accessible datasets cover only 54% of the 108 features identified in our taxonomy. These datasets frequently lack multimodal integration, regular updates, and clear license information-constraints that potentially limit detection tool development. Additionally, our analysis of 42 detection tools identifies several limitations: high computational resource requirements, inadequate multimodal data processing, insufficient longitudinal analysis capabilities, and limited clinical validation. Based on these observations, we highlight critical challenges and future research directions for advancing intelligent PCOS detection tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.