Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291535›Full record

ArticleMissouri medicine

Advance Care Planning: What, When, and How?

Lina Toledo-Franco, John Peters, Ashna Fatima Kamal, Christina Traber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lina Toledo-FrancoAssistant Professor, Director, Division of Palliative Medicine, Fellowship Director, Geriatric Medicine, Hospice and Palliative Medicine at SSM Health/Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
John PetersInternal Medicine Resident, at SSM Health/Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Ashna Fatima KamalHospice and Palliative Medicine Fellow at SSM Health/Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Christina TraberCertified Geriatric Nurse Practitioner, Division of Geriatric Medicine at SSM Health/Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advance care planning (ACP) is a fundamental part of the patient-provider relationship. It is a process that evaluates a person's values and determines preferences for care in various clinical scenarios, based on personal goals and expectations. ACP has two main goals: 1) identifying the surrogate decision maker; and 2) establishing the patient's goals of care for treatments or procedures which align with their wishes. ACP provides an opportunity to help patients and their families to prepare, on their own terms, for the changes brought by serious or progressive illness. This fosters a collaborative, therapeutic relationship in planning for the future.1 When addressing goals of care, it is essential to evaluate the perceived burden of certain procedures or life conditions such as depending on others for activities of daily living (ADLs) or living in a long-term care facility. As providers, we use patient history, laboratory data, exam findings, pathology reports, imaging studies, and more in making medical decisions for patients and recommending a plan of care. ACP can provide additional valuable information to guide patient-centered medical management. In this article, we will discuss the current state of goals-of-care conversations, compare the different ACP documents currently available, and provide guidance to providers on how to engage in these conversations. This includes addressing patient's values, wishes, and fears, without diminishing their sense of hope.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCommunicationDecision MakingHumansPatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID40291535
PMCPMC12021385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.