Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291510›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Quantification and Dosimetric Impact of Normal Organ Motion During Adaptive Radiation Therapy Planning Using a 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance-Equipped Linear Accelerator (MR-Linac).

David Wittmann, Eric S Paulson, Anjishnu Banerjee, Leou Ismael Banla, Christopher Schultz, Musaddiq Awan, Xinfeng Chen, Eenas A Omari, Michael Straza, X Allen Li and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03500081 (Solid Tumor Imaging MR-Linac), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03500081 suspendednot on this map

Solid Tumor Imaging MR-Linac (STIM Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2017 to 2029Enrolled295ConditionsCancerArmsMRI Scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David WittmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Eric S PaulsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Anjishnu BanerjeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Leou Ismael BanlaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christopher SchultzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Musaddiq AwanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Xinfeng ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Eenas A OmariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Michael StrazaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
X Allen LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Beth EricksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
William A HallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Patients receiving adaptive magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) undergo contour modification prior to treatment delivery, which takes 15 to over 60 minutes. We hypothesized that during the time required to create an adaptive MRgRT plan, organ movement will result in dosimetric changes to regional organs at risk (OARs). This study quantifies the dosimetric impact of OAR motion during the time required to perform adaptive MRgRT. Methods and Materials: Thirty-one patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and oligo-metastases who received MRgRT using a 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac were prospectively enrolled in an open registry imaging trial (NCT03500081). Two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were acquired predelivery for each MRgRT treatment fraction: an initial "pretreatment" MRI (input to the adaptive evaluation with or without recontouring and replanning process), and a second "verification MRI" (acquired after the recontouring and adaption process and immediately before treatment delivery or "beam-on"). On the verification MRI, normal organs were recontoured offline. Recontoured normal organs included the colon, duodenum, small bowel, and stomach. Differences in OARs between organ positions represented the normal organ movement during the time required for plan adaption. Maximum dose (Dmax), volumetric (V) 0.5 cubic centimeter dose (D0.5cc), 3000 cGy (V30), and 2000 cGy (V20) were calculated from the recontoured verification MRI. Results: Differences in Dmax, per fraction, for the listed normal organs were as follows: colon/rectum 239.50 cGy ( Conclusions: Statistically significant differences in small bowel doses are demonstrated as a result of motion during the timing required for adaptive MRgRT. These results reflect the importance of verifying MRI acquisition during adaptive MRgRT to confirm the location of OARs. They also identify the necessity of strategies to account for the dynamic nature of regional OARs.

Identifiers

PMID40291510
PMCPMC12023748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.