ArticleJB & JS open access
Glenoid Bone Grafting During Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Learning-Curve Analysis.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distal clavicle autograft: a relatively simple solution for glenoid bone loss at the time of revision reverse arthroplasty.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with structural bone grafting of the glenoid utilizing an autograft from the resected humeral head is an effective strategy to address severe glenoid bone loss. Although learning curves have been established for RSA, RSA with bone grafting is more technically challenging, with relatively higher complication rates. The number of cases needed for proficiency and the optimal learning strategies have yet to be defined for RSA with bone grafting. Methods: All patients who underwent primary, single-stage RSA with bone grafting for severe glenoid bone loss at our institution between November 2018 and February 2022 were identified. Perioperative data, including imaging, operative time, complications, revisions, postoperative functional data, and patient-reported outcomes, were recorded and analyzed. The learning curve for a fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeon was analyzed using linear regression and cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. CUSUM analysis objectively evaluated differences in operative time over the course of the surgeon's practice and elucidated the completion of the learning curve. Results: A total of 32 patients (53% male and 47% female; mean age, 68 years) were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up was 28 months. The mean operative time was 127 minutes, and there was a linear decrease in operative time throughout the study. CUSUM analysis using operative times demonstrated that the surgeon's learning curve was 14 patients. When comparing patients among the first 14 cases and the last 18 cases, there was no difference in shoulder range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), while visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at the time of final follow-up were better for patients in the surgeon's proficiency phase compared with the learning phase. Conclusions: In this study, we found a significant linear decrease in operative time with the number of cases completed, without associated detriment to the postoperative outcome or complication rate. Our findings suggest that at least 14 cases may be required before proficiency is obtained with RSA using humeral head bone graft. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.