ArticlePulmonary circulation2025
Role of a New Walk Test in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 6-min walk test (6MWT) has significant prognostic value, but requires long walking distances and lacks evaluation of exercise speed. This study aimed to investigate the clinical utility of a new walk test, the 18-meter walk test (18MWT), in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as a complement to the 6MWT. In summary, a total of 117 patients with PAH from January 2018 to December 2022 were included. Spearman correlation, Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis were utilized to demonstrate the value of 18MWT in predicting disease severity and clinical worsening. The median time to complete the 18MWT was 12.8 s (interquartile range: 11.3-14.6 s). 18MWT completion time showed significant correlations with indicators such as N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and 6MWT distance. Adjusted Cox regression showed 18MWT time remained an independent predictor of clinical worsening (hazard ratio = 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.21;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.