ArticleBio-protocol2025
GWAS Procedures for Gene Mapping in Diverse Populations With Complex Structures.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-Wide Identification of Candidate Genes Associated with Antler Weight in Tahe Red Deer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association study of agronomic traits in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a custom SNP marker set.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With reduced genotyping costs, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) face more challenges in diverse populations with complex structures to map genes of interest. The complex structure demands sophisticated statistical models, and increased marker density and population size require efficient computing tools. Many statistical models and computing tools have been developed with varied properties in statistical power, computing efficiency, and user-friendly accessibility. Some statistical models were developed with dedicated computing tools, such as efficient mixed model analysis (EMMA), multiple loci mixed model (MLMM), fixed and random model circulating probability unification (FarmCPU), and Bayesian-information and linkage-disequilibrium iteratively nested keyway (BLINK). However, there are computing tools (e.g., GAPIT) that implement multiple statistical models, retain a constant user interface, and maintain enhancement on input data and result interpretation. In this study, we developed a protocol utilizing a minimal set of software tools (BEAGLE, BLINK, and GAPIT) to perform a variety of analyses including file format conversion, missing genotype imputation, GWAS, and interpretation of input data and outcome results. We demonstrated the protocol by reanalyzing data from the Rice 3000 Genomes Project and highlighting advancements in GWAS model development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.