ArticleBiomedical engineering and computational biology2024
Automated High-Throughput Live Cell Monitoring of Scratch Wound Closure.
Article in Biomedical engineering and computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical evaluation of cysteine protease-inhibitor aloxistatin (E64d) for heart failure therapy.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- The Use of Biomass from In Vitro Fungal Cultures as a Bioactive Ingredient with Antimicrobial Activity in Hydrogel Dressings.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- New naphthalene-containing enamides: synthesis, structural insights and biological screening as potential anticancer agents against Huh-7 cancer cell line.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Repurposing of the small-molecule adrenoreceptor-inhibitor carvedilol for treatment of the fibrotic lung.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Angiogenesis and regenerative wound healing rely on the promotion of distinct endothelial cell phenotypes exhibiting increased migratory capacity. Monitoring of these hallmark events in vitro is invaluable for discovering novel therapeutics. However, respective methods often lack a high-throughput character or accurate analysis tools, which are essential for effective screening suitability. Methods and results: We stained nuclei of confluent human umbilical vein endothelial cells with Hoechst33342 prior to induction of an artificial scratch wound. Treatments with various growth factors and several concentrations of nintedanib were performed to microscopically evaluate impacts on wound closure. We developed 2 tools for automated analysis of wound closure image sets. Utilizing cell-free area measuring or cellular density evaluation, respectively, migration behavior was assessed well-wise for each time point. We identified pro-migratory effects of interleukin 1β as well as inhibitory actions of nintedanib. Hoechst33342 staining allowed for cell counting which was excluded as a contributing factor to wound closure in our assay. Conclusion: We developed a cost-effective, high-throughput pipeline for monitoring cell migration in vitro. We believe that our protocol will accelerate pre-clinical screenings not only for medications targeting endothelial wound closure but also drug discovery research in a broad range of diseases involving cellular migration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.