ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
The Barcelona baseline risk score to predict long-term prognosis after a first demyelinating event: a prospective observational study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spider-MS: an individualized polyhedral prediction of multiple sclerosis prognosis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Live Attenuated Measles-Mumps-Rubella and Varicella Vaccinations and Multiple Sclerosis Activity.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Predicting disease progression in multiple sclerosis with clinically accessible information and technology.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Multiple sclerosis: 2026 update.Free neuropathology · 2026Review
- Assessment of the RoAD Score as a Predictor of Long-Term Irreversible Ambulatory Disability in Multiple Sclerosis: Evidence from a Real-World Cohort.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Refining Prognostic Factors in Adult-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review of Current Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Multiple sclerosis as a biological and clinical continuum: from risk factors to the early stages of disease.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In multiple sclerosis (MS), predicting at symptom onset who will develop early and severe disability is an unmet need with significant therapeutic implications. Here we propose the Barcelona-Baseline Risk Score (BRS) model to predict long-term disease outcomes in a flexible and generalisable manner. Methods: Using prospectively acquired data from the Barcelona first-attack cohort, we created the Barcelona-BRS model as a set of six Weibull survival models of time to an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3.0, built with flexible combinations of predictors, including sex, age at first attack, and number and topography of T2 lesions, among others, adaptable to data availability. Data-driven risk groups were identified and compared in terms of long-term clinical and MRI outcomes, including relapse-associated worsening (RAW), progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), conversion to secondary progressive MS (SPMS), lesional and brain volumetric data, and patient-reported/administered clinical scores, through Kaplan-Meier and mixed-effects models. Finally, we externally validated our model in a completely unseen cohort. Findings: We included 1074 patients (737 [69%] female, mean age: 31.7 years) with a first demyelinating attack. Over a median follow-up of 11.9 years, 375 (35%), 298 (28%), and 94 (8.8%) developed RAW, PIRA, and SPMS, respectively. Weibull models included age at first attack, number of brain T2 lesions, and disability at first visit as main predictors. Four data-driven groups of increasing risk of unfavourable outcomes were created: Light-Green-BRS (N = 258), Dark-Green-BRS (N = 319), Orange-BRS (N = 321), and Red-BRS (N = 176), which, over time, behaved significantly differently across disability, quality of life, and MRI measures, being the Red-BRS the group with worst outcomes (p < 0.01). The results in the external validation cohort (N = 139, 100 female [72%], 34 years) mirrored those of the original one. Interpretation: The robustness, flexibility, and generalisability of the Barcelona-BRS model support its consideration as a ready-to-use tool for clinical practice. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.