ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Application and Evaluation of Spiral CT in the Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Disease in Children.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to explore the application of spiral CT in the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in children and evaluate its clinical value. Methods: The study included children diagnosed and treated at our hospital from January 2021 to October 2023 as research subjects. After excluding children who did not meet the complete inclusion criteria, a total of 60 cases were finally included. General data of all children were collected and summarized. Spiral CT and echocardiography were performed on all children, and the diagnostic results of both were compared with surgical findings to analyze and evaluate their application effectiveness. Results: Spiral CT detected 39 cases of intracardiac anomalies, 30 cases of abnormal connections of the great vessels, and 66 cases of extracardiac vascular anomalies, while echocardiography detected 33 cases of intracardiac anomalies, 29 cases of abnormal connections of the great vessels, and 43 cases of extracardiac vascular anomalies. Compared with surgical results, the detection rate of extracardiac vascular anomalies (98.59%) and the overall cardiovascular anomaly detection rate (98.54%) by spiral CT were significantly higher than those by echocardiography, with P<0.05. Conclusion: Spiral CT is a high-resolution, rapid, and safe imaging technique. Compared with traditional echocardiography, it is not only superior in diagnostic accuracy but also faster in imaging speed. It can clearly display the anatomical structure and spatial relationships of lesions, making it of great value in the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in children. It is suitable for clinical promotion and use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.