Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291394›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

A Neural Network for the Prediction of the Visual Acuity Gained from Vitrectomy and Peeling for Epiretinal Membrane.

Rupert Kamnig, Noah Robatsch, Anna Hillenmayer, Denise Vogt, Susanna F König, Efstathios Vounotrypidis, Armin Wolf, Christian M Wertheimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rupert KamnigDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Noah RobatschDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Anna HillenmayerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Denise VogtDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Susanna F KönigDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Efstathios VounotrypidisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Armin WolfDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Christian M WertheimerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: A significant proportion of patients with epiretinal membrane (ERM) demonstrate improvement in visual acuity (VA) 3 months after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and membrane peeling. The identification of these patients before surgery is clinically relevant. Design: This retrospective study was conducted to establish a neural network to predict improvement using preoperative clinical factors and OCT. Subjects: A total of 427 eyes from 423 patients who underwent a PPV for primary idiopathic ERM combined with or without cataract surgery were included. Methods: The data were automatically labeled according to whether an improvement of at least 2 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution lines was observed. A multilayer perceptron was trained using a set of 7 clinical factors. The images were processed using a convolutional network. The output of both networks was concatenated and presented to a second multilayer perceptron. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test datasets. Main Outcome Measures: The accuracy of the neural network on an independent test dataset for the prediction of postoperative VA was analyzed. The impact of individual clinical factors and images on performance was assessed using ablation studies and class activation maps. Results: The clinical factors alone demonstrated the highest accuracy of 0.74, with a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.67. These results were obtained after the exclusion of less significant factors in an ablation study. The inclusion of the factors age, preoperative lens status, preoperative VA, and the distinction between combined phacovitrectomy and vitrectomy yielded the most accurate results. In contrast, the use of ResNet18 as a neural network for image processing alone (0.61) or images combined with clinical factors (0.70) resulted in reduced accuracy. In the class activation map, image regions corresponding to the outer, central, and inner retina appeared to be important for the decision-making process. Conclusions: Our neural network has yielded favorable results in predicting improvement in VA in approximately 3-quarters of patients. This artificial intelligence-based personalized therapeutic strategy has the potential to aid decision-making. Future studies are to assess the clinical potential and generalizability and improve accuracy by including a more extensive dataset. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Deep learningEpiretinal membraneMembrane peelingPars plana vitrectomyRetinal imaging

Identifiers

PMID40291394
PMCPMC12022697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.