Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291384›Full record

ArticlePain reports2025

Temporal changes in cortical sensory processing during the transition from acute to chronic low back pain.

Wei-Ju Chang, Luke C Jenkins, Peter Humburg, Siobhan M Schabrun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei-Ju ChangCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0524-4883
Luke C JenkinsCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter HumburgCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Siobhan M SchabrunCentre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sensory cortex activity differs between acute and chronic low back pain (LBP) with decreased activity in acute LBP but increased activity in chronic LBP. However, it is unknown how and when sensory cortex activity changes during the transition from acute to chronic LBP and whether fluctuations in sensory cortex activity are associated with pain sensitivity. Objectives: To examine (1) the trajectory of changes in sensory cortex activity over a period of six months from the onset of acute LBP; (2) the assoication between sesnory cortex activity and pain pain sensitivity. Methods: In a prospective cohort study (N = 120), sensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded using electroencephalography within 6 weeks of LBP onset (baseline) and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Pain sensitivity was assessed using quantitative sensory testing (QST). Results: At baseline, individuals who developed chronic pain at 6-month follow-up exhibited less nonnoxious sensory processing (smaller area of N Conclusions: Nonnoxious sensory processing in acute LBP was less in those who developed chronic pain than those who recovered. Nonnoxious sensory processing increased over time in those who developed chronic pain but was unchanged in those who recovered. In the transition from acute to chronic LBP, nonnoxious sensory processing in the sensory cortex was not associated with pain sensitivity.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyLow back painQuantitative sensory testingSensory evoked potentialSomatosensory cortex

Identifiers

PMID40291384
PMCPMC12026378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.