ArticleCureus2025
Clinical Prediction Models for Pneumonia in Children Presenting to an Emergency Department in a Resource-Limited Setting Using Lung Ultrasound Diagnosis as the Gold Standard.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClinical prediction rules for pediatric pneumonia often rely on radiographic pneumonia for diagnosis; however, lung ultrasound has higher diagnostic accuracy. Our objective was to derive a clinical prediction model for pneumonia in children under five using lung ultrasound as the criterion standard.
methodsThis was a prospective study of children under five presenting to an emergency department (ED) with respiratory complaints in a resource-limited setting. Clinical findings, chest X-ray, and lung ultrasound results were recorded for each patient. Classification tree models were used to predict pneumonia using lung ultrasound as the criterion standard. Separate models were used without and with inclusion of chest X-ray results.
resultsOf 386 patients enrolled, 125 patients (32.4%) had pneumonia on lung ultrasound. The mean age was 20.8 (SD 15.5) months. Using recursive feature selection, three variables provided the best prediction for pneumonia, namely, crepitations, retractions, and difficulty breathing, demonstrating a sensitivity of 74.2% and specificity of 38.5%. The algorithm including chest X-ray provided a sensitivity of 51.6% and specificity of 87.7%.
conclusionsUsing lung ultrasound as the gold standard, no single clinical finding or combination of clinical findings provided enough accuracy to reliably diagnose pneumonia in children under five years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.