Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291322›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Clinical Prediction Models for Pneumonia in Children Presenting to an Emergency Department in a Resource-Limited Setting Using Lung Ultrasound Diagnosis as the Gold Standard.

Darlene R House, Yogendra Amatya, Benjamin K Nti, Frances M Russell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Darlene R HouseEmergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Yogendra AmatyaGeneral Practice and Emergency Department, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, NPL.
Benjamin K NtiEmergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Frances M RussellEmergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical prediction rules for pediatric pneumonia often rely on radiographic pneumonia for diagnosis; however, lung ultrasound has higher diagnostic accuracy. Our objective was to derive a clinical prediction model for pneumonia in children under five using lung ultrasound as the criterion standard.

methodsThis was a prospective study of children under five presenting to an emergency department (ED) with respiratory complaints in a resource-limited setting. Clinical findings, chest X-ray, and lung ultrasound results were recorded for each patient. Classification tree models were used to predict pneumonia using lung ultrasound as the criterion standard. Separate models were used without and with inclusion of chest X-ray results.

resultsOf 386 patients enrolled, 125 patients (32.4%) had pneumonia on lung ultrasound. The mean age was 20.8 (SD 15.5) months. Using recursive feature selection, three variables provided the best prediction for pneumonia, namely, crepitations, retractions, and difficulty breathing, demonstrating a sensitivity of 74.2% and specificity of 38.5%. The algorithm including chest X-ray provided a sensitivity of 51.6% and specificity of 87.7%.

conclusionsUsing lung ultrasound as the gold standard, no single clinical finding or combination of clinical findings provided enough accuracy to reliably diagnose pneumonia in children under five years.

Indexed as

developing countriesdiagnosislung ultrasoundpediatricspneumonia

Identifiers

PMID40291322
PMCPMC12034295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.