ReviewCureus2025
Meniscal Bucket-Handle Tears and Return to Sports in Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Failure rates increase over time and are higher following medial arthroscopic bucket-handle meniscal repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bucket-handle tears represent a subtype of meniscal injuries that involve a full-thickness longitudinal tear. These tears are challenging and demanding. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate return-to-sport outcomes in young adults with isolated bucket-handle meniscal tears treated surgically through meniscal repair. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with two independent reviewers selecting studies from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Studies were included if they involved patients over 16 years old, with isolated bucket-handle tears, a minimum of one-year follow-up, and reported postoperative Tegner scores. Five studies comprising 168 individual knees met these criteria and were analyzed. Quality assessment employed the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data analysis was conducted in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) for pooled outcome calculations. The primary outcome was the postoperative Tegner score, representing a return to sports; secondary outcomes included changes in Tegner and Lysholm scores and failure rates. Two cohort studies and three case series were included, with quality ratings ranging from fair to poor. The mean patient age was 27.8 years, and the mean follow-up was 82.4 months. The pooled postoperative Tegner score was 5.94 (95% CI: 5.41-6.46), indicating a high return to recreational sports. The mean change in Tegner score was 2.48 (p = 0.0604), which was not statistically significant, while Lysholm score improvement was significant at 31.16 points (p = 0.0093). The pooled failure rate across studies was 14% (95% CI: 0-42%). Patients with isolated bucket-handle meniscal tears undergoing surgical repair demonstrate a high rate of return to recreational sports, with significant improvements in Lysholm scores. However, failure rates and study quality variability suggest further high-quality research to make safer conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.