Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291270›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Tool to Assess Bias, Racism, and Allyship in the Healthcare Learning Environment.

Simran Shamith, Carolyn Giordano, Beverley A Crawford, Angela Jones, Kaitlyn Bleiweiss, Elizabeth Kachur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simran ShamithMedicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Carolyn GiordanoMedical Education, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Beverley A CrawfordClinical Restorative Dentistry, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Angela JonesNursing, Wilkes University Passan School of Nursing, Wilkes-Barre, USA.
Kaitlyn BleiweissAssessment and Evaluation, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Elizabeth KachurMedical Education, Medical Education Development, Global Consulting, New York City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile healthcare students receive robust clinical training, social issues like bias and allyship are often overlooked. This study developed a new survey tool to assess how healthcare students perceive bias, racism, and allyship in their learning environment.

methodsUsing a validated scale as a frame from the John Hopkins Learning Environment Survey (JHLES), researchers created a new assessment tool to measure perceptions of bias, racism, and allyship across three different healthcare institutions representing medicine, dentistry, and nursing.  Results: A total of 212 responses were collected. The data showed that non-minority students had greater agreement on questions regarding equitable opportunities to excel, feeling free to speak up in clinical settings against bias, and overall perceptions of the learning environment. Men felt more comfortable speaking up against racial bias or feeling that someone would speak out on their behalf and reported higher feelings of acceptance within their learning environment.

conclusionThis study developed and implemented a new survey tool to assess bias and racism across three medical education environments, medicine, dentistry, and nursing, demonstrating its relevance across fields with differing curricula and cultures. While small differences related to institution, minority status, gender, and class year were noted, the tool's wide applicability provides a baseline for institutions seeking to assess bias within their learning environments.

Indexed as

bias and allyshipdental educationhealthcare educationlearning environmentmedical educationnursing education

Identifiers

PMID40291270
PMCPMC12021688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.