ArticleCureus2025
Anesthetic Management of Awake Craniotomy Versus Traditional Craniotomy at a Single Academic Center: A Retrospective Review.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BBB-Permeable Near-Infrared Oxazine Fluorophores for White Matter Tract Imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Awake craniotomies (AC) are an increasingly popular surgical technique used in medical institutions worldwide. This rise in adoption is largely due to improved patient outcomes and satisfaction. This procedure allows for real-time monitoring of neurological functions, which helps surgeons preserve critical cognitive, language, and motor abilities. As a result, patients tend to retain neurological functions closer to their baseline levels, highlighting the technique's advantages in modern neurosurgery. Neuromonitoring and brain mapping allow surgeons to perform resections more precisely in delicate anatomical areas. We developed and implemented a protocol for awake craniotomy procedures at the University of Mississippi Medical Center a few years ago. The purpose of this study was to assess and analyze the data between anesthetic management of awake craniotomy and traditional craniotomy (TC). We compared patient characteristics, anesthetic management, surgical duration, complications, opioid requirements, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Our results indicated a statistically significant reduction in the opioid requirement for patients in the awake craniotomy group with no difference in the overall length of stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.