ArticleCureus2025
A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Events for Avelumab.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Side Effects Become Therapies: A Mechanistic Taxonomy of Adverse Drug Reactions as Translational Signals for Drug Repositioning.Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- FAERS database reveals latent signals of neuro-ophthalmic toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: feature mining and clinical warnings.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background This study utilized data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with avelumab, spanning from the third quarter of 2015 to the first quarter of 2024. Methodology We collected and normalized avelumab ADE data from Q3 2015 to Q1 2024. To ensure robust signal detection and accurate measurement of association strength, we employed key techniques, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM). These methods allowed for the comparison of event proportions, consideration of uncertainties, and adjustment for reporting variability, ensuring reliable signal quantification and analysis. Results In our review of 3,978 ADE reports, we classified unique preferred terms (PTs) into 22 systematic organ classifications (SOCs) to detail the range of avelumab-associated adverse reactions. The most commonly reported SOC was "General disease and administration site conditions," with 868 cases reported (ROR = 1.22, PRR = 1.17, IC = 0.23, EBGM = 1.17). The second was nervous system disorders (294 cases) (ROR = 0.9, PRR = 0.91, IC = 0.14, EBGM = 0.91). The incidence of "Injury, poisoning and procedural complications" was 253 cases (ROR = 0.52, PRR = 0.55, IC = 0.86, EBGM = 0.55). This rank highlighted significant differences in the frequency and risk indicators of these diseases. It is worth noting that PTs with strong signals detected included thrombocytopenia (n = 35, ROR = 4.98, PRR = 4.95, IC = 2.31, EBGM = 4.95), hypothyroidism (n = 31, ROR = 15.49, PRR = 15.38, IC = 3.94, EBGM = 15.36), and renal impairment (n = 23, ROR = 3.93, PRR = 3.91, IC = 1.97, EBGM = 3.91). Conclusions While avelumab offers significant therapeutic benefits, its use carries potential adverse effects. Clinicians must remain vigilant in monitoring patients, particularly for severe symptoms, such as thrombocytopenia, hypothyroidism, and renal impairment, to ensure prompt intervention and minimize risks. Early detection of these and other potential events will help healthcare providers better manage and mitigate the risks associated with avelumab treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.