ArticleCureus2025
Accuracy of the AI-Based Smart Scope® Test as a Point-of-Care Screening and Triage Tool Compared to Colposcopy: A Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bringing Cervical Cancer Screening Closer to Women: Feasibility of Artificial Intelligence and Remote Assessment in Primary Health Care.International journal of public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives The primary objective of this study was to compare the screening accuracy of AI assessment with colposcopy. Secondary objectives included comparing the triaging accuracy of AI and colposcopy assessments against histopathology. Methodology This prospective, single-arm screening test assessment study was conducted at the obstetrics and gynecology department of Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College in Pune, India. The study included sexually active, nonpregnant women aged 25-65 years visiting the OPD for per-speculum examination. Women with a clinically unhealthy cervix detected during the examination were counseled, and those who provided consent were enrolled. Patients with a history of prior cervical cancer treatment or hysterectomy were excluded. A total of 130 women were enrolled. Each participant underwent colposcopy, Smart Scope
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.