Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291219›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Patients With Increased Intra-abdominal Pressure.

Christos Doudakmanis, Demosthenes Makris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christos DoudakmanisDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, GRC.
Demosthenes MakrisDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is a significant clinical concern, which has been proven to cause significant adverse events in patients. Respiratory infections are a high-yield problem in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this study, we reviewed available literature regarding the relationship between elevated IAP and the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in mechanically ventilated patients. Patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation are prone to develop VAP. Longer hospitalization, prior use of antibiotics, and comorbidities make these patients more susceptible to infections. Multidrug-resistant VAP poses a vast threat to critically ill patients, as it is characterized by a shift in the microbiological profile of the disease, as well as difficulties in its treatment options. Elevated IAP could adversely affect mechanically ventilated patients, as it is associated with an elevated risk of microaspirations and altered patency of the intestinal barrier, thus comprising an important factor for developing VAP. In addition, elevated IAP can deteriorate pulmonary function and hemodynamic condition of the patient, adding an extra risk for developing VAP. In such frail conditions, these patients have compromised immune function and are at risk of developing systematic infection, even resulting in the failure of multiple organs. As the microbiologic profile shifts toward multidrug-resistant bacteria, there is a need for comprehensive strategies in ICU settings to mitigate the risks associated with both elevated IAP and multidrug-resistant VAP. Timely intervention and proper management can prevent the risk of difficult-to-treat infections and life-threatening adverse events for patients.

Indexed as

intra-abdominal hypertensionintra-abdominal pressuremechanical ventilationmultidrug resistant (mdr)ventilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID40291219
PMCPMC12034327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.