ArticleCureus2025
Customized Silicone Ocular Prosthesis for Post-exenteration Rehabilitation: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating AI Chatbots in Prosthodontics Education: A Quantitative MCQ-Based Assessment.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ocular loss due to malignancies, trauma, or congenital anomalies can lead to significant aesthetic and psychological challenges. Orbital exenteration, a radical surgical procedure involving the removal of the eye and surrounding structures, leaves patients with severe facial deformities, impairing their self-esteem and social interactions. Prosthetic rehabilitation plays a vital role in restoring facial symmetry and improving the quality of life for such individuals. This case report presents the prosthetic rehabilitation of a 57-year-old male patient who underwent orbital exenteration due to squamous cell carcinoma. Despite undergoing surgery in 2009, the patient was not referred for a prosthetic solution at the time, leading to years of social withdrawal and psychological distress. Upon referral to the Department of Prosthodontics, various treatment options were discussed, and a custom silicone ocular prosthesis was chosen based on the patient's preference for an economical and non-invasive solution. The fabrication process involved a systematic approach, starting with primary and secondary impressions to accurately capture the anatomic contours of the defect. A wax pattern was created for trial fitting and aesthetic evaluation, ensuring a close match with the patient's natural eye. The final prosthesis was processed using room-temperature vulcanized silicone, which provided superior aesthetics, flexibility, and comfort. The prosthesis was designed to be retained using natural anatomical undercuts, eliminating the need for adhesives or external support. The patient exhibited significant psychological and social improvement following prosthesis insertion. The custom ocular prosthesis successfully restored facial aesthetics, improved self-confidence, and facilitated social reintegration. This case underscores the importance of early prosthetic referral and highlights the impact of a multidisciplinary approach in post-exenteration rehabilitation, ensuring optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes for patients with orbital defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.