ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2024
Next-Generation Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques for Characterization of Myocardial Disease.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Multiparametric CMR in Myocarditis: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic Advances, Prognostic Value, and the Challenge of Genetic Mimics.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Cardiac magnetic resonance in the maze of myeloma-related cardiovascular complications: a decisive diagnostic role.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Prospective Assessment of Cardiac Iron Deposition, Morphology, and Function by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Transfusion-Dependent and Neo-Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of the Review: Many novel cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMR) techniques have been developed for diagnosis, risk stratification, and monitoring of myocardial disease. The field is changing rapidly with advances in imaging technology. The purpose of this review is to give an update on next-generation cMR techniques with promising developments for clinical translation in the last two years, and to outline clinical applications. Recent Findings: There has been increasing widespread clinical adoption of T1/T2 mapping into standard of care clinical practice. Development of auto segmentation has enabled clinical integration, with potential applications to minimize the use of contrast. Advances in diffusion tensor imaging, multiparametric mapping with cardiac MRI fingerprinting, automated quantitative perfusion mapping, metabolic imaging, elastography, and 4D flow are advancing the ability of cMR to provide further quantitative characterization to enable deep myocardial disease phenotyping. Together these advanced imaging features further augment the ability of cMR to contribute to novel disease characterization and may provide an important platform for personalized medicine. Summary: Next-generation cMR techniques provide unique quantitative imaging features that can enable the identification of imaging biomarkers that may further refine disease classification and risk prediction. However, widespread clinical application continues to be limited by ground truth validation, reproducibility of the techniques across vendor platforms, increased scan time, and lack of widespread availability of advanced cardiac MRI physicists and expert readers. However, these techniques show great promise in minimizing the need for invasive testing, may elucidate novel pathophysiology, and may provide the ability for more accurate diagnosis of myocardial disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.