ReviewSAGE open medicine2025
Advancements in clinical practices of computed tomography imaging and its implications on surgical strategies for the management of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: A systematic review.
Review in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This systematic review examines advancements in computed tomography imaging-based classification systems and their implications for surgical decision-making in managing cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Methods: This study is a systematic review. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases identified relevant studies published from January 2010 to July 2024. The search utilized keywords including "ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament," "cervical," "spine," "computed tomography," and "classification." Studies meeting predefined inclusion criteria focused on computed tomography imaging for diagnosing and surgically managing cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The study adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and the ROBINS-I tool was used for risk of bias assessment. Results: Sixteen studies were included, demonstrating that computed tomography imaging enhances diagnostic precision and classification reliability for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Comparative analysis across studies revealed consistent trends in computed tomography-based classification improving surgical decision-making, particularly influencing anterior approaches such as anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion. However, moderate to severe risks of bias were identified in some studies, primarily due to confounding variables and deviations from intended interventions. Additionally, computed tomography imaging's role in prevalence studies has been expanded by incorporating, which highlights its epidemiological significance. The review also discusses the disadvantages of computed tomography, including radiation exposure and cost implications. Conclusions: Computed tomography imaging is a crucial modality for diagnosing and managing cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, offering superior lesion classification and guiding surgical decision-making. Future research should refine classification systems and integrate multimodal imaging approaches to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.