Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291141›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025

Development, validation, and clinical utility of risk prediction models for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A retrospective and prospective cohort study.

Shuai Jin, Dan Qin, Chong Wang, Baosheng Liang, Lichuan Zhang, Weiyin Gao, Xiao Wang, Bo Jiang, Benqiang Rao, Hanping Shi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Cancer-Associated Atrial Fibrillation: Who, When, and How to Manage Antithrombotic Therapy.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
  8. Semi-Supervised Learning to Improve Generalizability of Cancer Associated-Venous Thromboembolism Risk Prediction Models.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shuai JinDepartment of Adult Care, School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dan QinDivision of Medical & Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Chong WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Baosheng LiangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Lichuan ZhangDivision of Medical & Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Weiyin GaoOperating Room, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Xiao WangDivision of Medical & Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Bo JiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Benqiang RaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hanping ShiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lihui LiuDepartment of Nursing, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qian LuDivision of Medical & Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to develop cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) risk prediction models using survival machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods: This study employed a double-cohort study design (retrospective and prospective). The retrospective cohort ( Results: Univariate analysis and LASSO-COX regression both selected five predictors: age, previous VTE history, ICU/CCU, CCI, and D-dimer. The seven survival ML models (C-index: 0.709-0.760; Brier Score: 0.212-0.243) all outperformed Khorana Score (C-index: 0.632; Brier Score: 0.260) in external validation set. Among all models, the COX_DD model (COX regression ​+ ​D-dimer) performed best. However, ML models and Khorana Score predicted CA-VTE risk on Conclusions: In this study, the CA-VTE risk prediction models developed in seven survival ML algorithms outperformed Khorana Score. Combining with D-dimer can improve model performance. Applying the nomogram based on the optimal COX_DD model allows oncology nurse to reassess CA-VTE risk once a week. The prediction models developed using survival ML algorithms in this study may contribute to the dynamic and accurate risk assessment of CA-VTE for cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Decision makingNeoplasmsRisk stratificationSurvival machine learning algorithmVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID40291141
PMCPMC12032184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.