ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Evidence summary on pain management in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evidence summary for optimal glycemic variability management during enteral nutrition in adult ICU patients with cerebral infarction.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Liposomal bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Effect of ERAS-based refined nursing on postoperative pain management in lung cancer surgery patients.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Perioperative EGFR-Targeted Therapy in Resectable EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: A Narrative Review from Drug Design to Pain-Informed MRD-Guided Care.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to systematically retrieve, evaluate and summarize evidence on perioperative pain management in adults undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, to assist oncology nurses in improving pain assessment and management. Methods: The research question was established using PIPOST model and a systematic search was conducted in English and Chinese databases, professional society websites and guideline platforms for literature published between January 2017 and December 2024. Included literature types comprised guidelines, systematic reviews, evidence summaries, expert consensus, and standards. After literature searching and screening in January 2025, the remaining guidelines were evaluated by four investigators, while other literature was assessed by two investigators. Evidence was then extracted and graded. Results: Eighteen articles were included, comprising 5 systematic reviews, 3 guidelines, 2 clinical decisions, 4 evidence summaries, 3 expert consensus, and 1 standard. Twenty-five pieces of evidence across six topics were summarized, covering organizational management, high-risk patient assessment and preoperative education, pain assessment, intraoperative analgesia, multimodal pharmacological strategies, and non-pharmacological interventions. Conclusions: This evidence summary highlights effective strategies for perioperative pain management in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, which could support oncology nurses in implementing comprehensive pain assessment, identifying high-risk patients, and applying diversified analgesic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.