Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291132›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025

Advancements in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases: A comparative review and study on future insights.

Eyad Gadour, Bogdan Miutescu, Zeinab Hassan, Emad S Aljahdli, Khurram Raees

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eyad GadourMultiorgan Transplant Centre of Excellence, Liver Transplantation Unit, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam 32253, Saudi Arabia.
Bogdan MiutescuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara 300041, Romania.
Zeinab HassanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Stockport Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester SK2 7JE, United Kingdom.
Emad S AljahdliGastroenterology Division, King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Medicine, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Khurram RaeesDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn BB2 3HH, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to the complex and often asymptomatic presentations, the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases, including pancreatic and biliary malignancies, remains challenging. Recent technological advancements have remarkably improved the diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in these diseases. This review explores key advancements in diagnostic modalities, including biomarkers, imaging techniques, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies. Biomarkers, such as cancer antigen 19-9,

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence in gastroenterologyBiliopancreatic diseasesBiomarkers in biliopancreatic diseasesDiagnostic advancementsEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyEndoscopic ultrasoundMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographyPeroral cholangiopancreatoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40291132
PMCPMC12019128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.