ArticleJournal of social work practice in the addictions2024
Examining substitution behaviors in a non-treatment sample of current drinkers: an exploratory study.
Article in Journal of social work practice in the addictions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a sample of adults who reported cutting down on their alcohol use in the past 3 months, study goals were to Identify how many increased consumption of licit substances (called 'substituters'); and analyze the psychological profiles of substituters compared to non-substituters. Participants (25.6% Latinx, 46.2% female) were recruited using Amazon's Mturk and completed questionnaires on substance use substitution (i.e. any increased use of a substance while cutting down on another substance) and stress, depression, and anxiety. Among those reporting decreases in alcohol use (N = 78), 78% substituted (N = 61), defined as concomitant increases in food, cannabis, or nicotine. Substituters had higher levels of pysychological distress, reported greater polysubstance use and significantly higher levels of problems related to use than non-substituters. All of the Latinx participants (n = 20) reported substitution and reported significantly higher psychological distress than non-Latinx substituters. Latinxs who reported substitution had more serious psychological profiles and problems related to substance use. The findings provide evidence for a clinical phenomenon involving substitution in a non-treatment sample. Future studies should examine this phenomenon among people in addiction treatment and among Latinxs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.