ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Care staff perspectives of clinically meaningful outcomes for dementia residents.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
- A qualitative study of music-based intervention use for Alzheimer's disease in elder care communities.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNon-pharmacological complementary and supportive care programs (CSCP, e.g., music therapy) are provided in addition to standard medical care for persons with dementia (PWD). Care staff observations are critical in assessing the clinical impact of CSCP on PWD. However, little is known about care staff experiences of CSCP and what factors influence documentation of outcomes. We sought to understand how care staff in Kentucky describe the clinically meaningful impact of CSCP on residents and themselves and learn what conditions enable and prohibit documentation.
methodsFour care staff from four dementia care facilities in Kentucky (representing non-profit, for-profit; rural, suburban, and urban areas) participated in this qualitative multiple case study. Participants were selected to reflect diverse care roles, identities, and experience. We collected data from eight semi-structured interviews (two per participant), 24 journal entries, four observations, photographs, and publicly available facility data. The use of multiple data types helped triangulate findings and enrich the analysis. Data were coded and analyzed for emerging themes.
resultsParticipants described CSCP as enhancing residents' holistic well-being and being person-centered. CSCP also improved participants' well-being and enhanced their sense of purpose. Primary documentation barriers were lack of time, prioritizing resident care over documentation, and top-down regulations. Technology both enabled and prohibited documentation, with routine being a key facilitator. DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate that CSCP improve PWD's quality of life by fostering engagement, joy, and personalized care, consistent with person-centered care principles. Staff also benefit from reduced stress and improved morale. However, barriers exist, including time constraints and documentation challenges. Results may inform directions for future research, translation of CSCP from research to practice, and feasible measurement of clinically meaningful outcomes. The study underscores the importance of addressing systemic issues and advocating for policies that support sustainable, quality dementia care while enhancing both resident and staff well-being. Highlights: Care staff view person-centered care programs as vital for residents' well-being.Complementary programs reduce burnout and boost morale in demanding care settings.Feasible documentation is crucial to track meaningful outcomes within time limits.Results emphasize the need for policies that support care staff and quality care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.