ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2025
Digital clinical decision support to improve care and to save costs: a pilot survey of the views of frontline healthcare professionals.
Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A balancing act: the promise and pitfalls of clinical decision support.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There has been much discourse about the features and impact of clinical decision support. However, until recently, there has been less evidence on Methods: Frontline resident doctors were invited to complete an online semistructured questionnaire on if, and how, they used a clinical decision support resource to obtain and apply information to provide evidence-based care and/or to save costs. Results: Among the respondents, 93% agreed or strongly agreed that the clinical decision support helped them obtain information to provide evidence-based care, and 93% agreed or strongly agreed that they could apply the information obtained from the resource to provide evidence-based care. Half of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that using the resource helped them save healthcare costs. Discussion: The results strongly support the idea that the doctors used the resource to provide evidence-based care; the results related to cost savings were not as strong.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.