Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291036›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of psychiatry2025

Cannabis and psychopathology: 2024 Snapshot of a meandering journey.

Tathagata Mahintamani, Diptadhi Mukherjee, Debasish Basu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tathagata MahintamaniDepartment of Addiction Medicine, and Psychiatry, Lokopriya Gopinath Bordoloi Regional Institute of Mental Health, Tezpur, Assam, India.
Diptadhi MukherjeeDepartment of Addiction Medicine, and Psychiatry, Lokopriya Gopinath Bordoloi Regional Institute of Mental Health, Tezpur, Assam, India.
Debasish BasuDepartment of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cannabis has been associated with psychopathology since ancient times, but controversies continue despite important advances in the field. This article is the fourth one in our decadal series of review articles that have been providing an update snapshot of the meandering journey of the research findings in this area. Aims: This narrative review of a comprehensive literature search over the past 10 years aims to provide an update and current understanding, while raising unanswered questions for the future, focusing on the following areas: (a) nosological changes in cannabis-related psychiatric syndromes; (b) psychopathology associated with the newer category of synthetic cannabinoids; (c) cannabis withdrawal syndrome); (d) cannabis and psychosis; (e) cannabis and mood disorders; (f) cannabis and suicidality; (g) prenatal cannabis use and psychopathology in the offspring; (h) effect of recent liberal policy overhaul on cannabis control in certain countries/areas on psychopathology and adverse outcomes; (i) cannabis and cognition; and (j) cannabis, psychopathology, and genetics. Methods: The data search strategies involved a combination of electronic databases and manual hand-searching of relevant publications and cross-references using selected search terms. The primary electronic search focused on Medline and PubMed Central databases but extended to databases such as Google Scholar, PsychINFO, Scopus, and Ovid for specific sections. Key references identified through electronic and manual searches provided additional material. Inclusion criteria for the review spanned studies published between January 2014 and June 2024, with more emphasis placed on recent studies (post-2020) while ensuring historical coverage. Results: The narrative review aimed to be comprehensive, including a broad range of research without strict methodological exclusions. Strengths and limitations of cited research are discussed when applicable, maintaining consistency with three prior reviews. We focused on psychopathology and psychiatric syndromes, human (rather than animal) studies, and applied (rather than basic) research. We have only focused on policy with reference to psychopathology and not on that entire area because that would be beyond the scope of this article. There are important updates in all the areas covered. There are newer syndromal entities in ICD-11, which also includes synthetic cannabinoids for the first time. Cannabis withdrawal syndrome has been better characterized. The association between cannabis and psychosis has been robustly established especially for very high-potency cannabis and for vulnerable populations, particularly young people. Work is in progress elucidating the causal mechanisms. The links between cannabis and mood disorders as well as suicidality and cognitive impairment are better characterized, though questions remain. Recent liberalizing policies on cannabis have produced newer findings on prenatal and accidental cannabis use (with deleterious effects on the offspring) and on later psychopathology (mixed findings, but a documented increase in emergency visits related to recent cannabis use). This is an area which will require active monitoring for new data. Conclusion: The field of cannabis use and psychopathology continues to collect new data and settle some old controversies while raising new questions, which are important to address in view of the wide use of cannabis worldwide and its implications for public health.

Indexed as

Cannabisgeneticsmood disorderspolicyprenatal exposurepsychopathologysuicidality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.