ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Predicting nosocomial pneumonia of patients with acute brain injury in intensive care unit using machine-learning models.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting family doctor contract fulfillment propensity using the FA-GA-BP model and per capita household expenditures.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study is to construct and validate new machine learning models to predict pneumonia events in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute brain injury. Methods: Acute brain injury patients in ICU of hospitals from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021 were retrospective reviewed. Patients were divided into training, and validation sets. The primary outcome was nosocomial pneumonia infection during ICU stay. Machine learning models including XGBoost, DecisionTree, Random Forest, Light GBM, Adaptive Boost, BP, and TabNet were used for model derivation. The predictive value of each model was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC), and internal and external validation was performed. Results: A total of 280 ICU patients with acute brain injury were included. Five independent variables for nosocomial pneumonia infection were identified and selected for machine learning model derivations and validations, including tracheotomy time, antibiotic use days, blood glucose, ventilator-assisted ventilation time, and C-reactive protein. The training set revealed the superior and robust performance of the XGBoost with the highest AUC value (0.956), while the Random Forest and Adaptive Boost had the highest AUC value (0.883) in validation set. Conclusion: Machine learning models can effectively predict the risk of nosocomial pneumonia infection in patients with acute brain injury in the ICU. Despite differences in populations and algorithms, the models we constructed demonstrated reliable predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.