ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
The patient journey and burden of disease in progressive pulmonary fibrosis in Japan: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of time to diagnosis in patients with progressive fibrotic ILD: a systematic review.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Pooled it
- Holistic Management of Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- A syndromic framework for progressive pulmonary fibrosis.Respiratory research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with a progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) phenotype, current knowledge of patient experience and symptom burden is limited. This study aimed to describe the patient journey for patients with PPF and IPF in a real-world setting in Japan. Methods: Data were analyzed from the Adelphi Real World PPF-ILD Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey with elements of retrospective data collection of pulmonologists and rheumatologists in Japan from April to October 2022. Participants provided data for up to 12 consecutive patients with physician-confirmed ILD with a progressive phenotype. Analyses were descriptive, except Kappa (κ) statistic was used to measure the alignment between physician- and patient-reported symptom burden in the 4 weeks prior to survey date (poor agreement: κ =<0.00; slight 0.00-0.20; fair 0.21-0.40; moderate 0.41-0.60; substantial 0.61-0.80; almost perfect 1.00). Results: A total of 63 physicians (43 pulmonologists and 20 rheumatologists) provided data on 382 patients (312 with PPF and 70 with IPF). These patients were also asked to complete a voluntary survey on their experience and symptoms. Mean time from first symptom to consultation was 14.1 months for IPF, 8.0 months for non-connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated ILDs, and 10.7 months for CTD-ILDs. Mean times from consultation to diagnosis were 7.1, 4.8, and 3.6 months, respectively. Perception of symptoms differed between physicians and patients with alignment ranging from poor (dysphagia, κ = -0.0296, Conclusions: This real-world study expands our understanding of the patient journey for patients with PPF and IPF in Japan. Greater communication between patients and physicians is needed to shorten diagnostic delays and target treatment strategies to improve patient experience and overall outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.