ArticleACS omega2025
Optimizing Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Models for Rapid and Green Detection of Crude Protein and Fat in Crop Grains Using Sample Set Division.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid detection of crop grain components is crucial for effective production and energy conversion. We used the sample set division method to divide multiple sample sets and optimize NIRS models for rapid prediction of protein and fat content. 1243 and 415 crop grain samples were screened and divided into 5 and 4 sets, respectively. The aim was to establish NIRS models for protein and fat content prediction. The best modeling methods for protein were N (Norris Derivative)+D (detrending)-C (CARS)-P (PLS) and N+M (MC-UVE)-C-P, while those for fat were N+M-C-P and N+S (Savitzky-Golay)-C-P. The SS (Soybean Set), KS (Sorghum Set), and FS (Full Samples Set) data sets provided accurate protein content analysis, while the FS and SS data sets were suitable for both protein content prediction and evaluation. For fat, the FS, SS, and CS (Cereal Set) models met content analysis requirements, with the FS model suitable for external validation. It compared and analyzed the fitness, robustness, and accuracy of different NIRS set models, employing various division methods in this study, which provided a new idea of green method theoretical and technical support for major component rapid detection of biomass raw materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.