Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290944›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Comparative Analysis of Electron Microscopy Techniques for Hydrogel Microarchitecture Characterization: SEM, Cryo-SEM, ESEM, and TEM.

Jeanne Aigoin, Bruno Payré, Jeanne Minvielle Moncla, Mélanie Escudero, Dominique Goudouneche, Daniel Ferri-Angulo, Pierre-François Calmon, Laurence Vaysse, Philippe Kemoun, Laurent Malaquin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jeanne AigoinLAAS-CNRS, 7 avenue du colonel Roche, Toulouse 31400, France.
Bruno PayréCMEAB, Universite Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, CMEAB, 133 route de Narbonne, Toulouse 31062, France.
Jeanne Minvielle MonclaLAAS-CNRS, 7 avenue du colonel Roche, Toulouse 31400, France.
Mélanie EscuderoLAAS-CNRS, 7 avenue du colonel Roche, Toulouse 31400, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0952-0048
Dominique GoudounecheCMEAB, Universite Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, CMEAB, 133 route de Narbonne, Toulouse 31062, France.
Daniel Ferri-AnguloLAAS-CNRS, 7 avenue du colonel Roche, Toulouse 31400, France.
Pierre-François CalmonLAAS-CNRS, 7 avenue du colonel Roche, Toulouse 31400, France.
Laurence VaysseRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, 4 bis Avenue Hubert Curien, Toulouse 31100, France.
Philippe KemounRESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, EFS, ENVT, 4 bis Avenue Hubert Curien, Toulouse 31100, France.
Laurent MalaquinLAAS-CNRS, 7 avenue du colonel Roche, Toulouse 31400, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4791-3352
Julie FoncyLAAS-CNRS, 7 avenue du colonel Roche, Toulouse 31400, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2503-6857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogels have emerged as a versatile class of materials with broad applications in biomedical engineering, drug delivery, and tissue engineering. Understanding their intricate structures and morphologies is crucial for tailoring their properties to meet specific biomedical needs. It has been clearly established that the composition and microarchitecture of the materials play a critical role in essential cellular mechanisms such as mechanosensing, adhesion, and remodeling. This question is essential in tissue engineering, where precisely characterizing the microarchitecture of the materials used to model the cell microenvironment is a critical step to ensure the reproducibility and relevance of reconstructed tissues. In this study, we present a comprehensive comparison of four advanced electron microscopy techniques, namely, scanning electron microscopy, cryo-scanning electron microscopy, environmental scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy, to observe the hydrogel microarchitecture, including a comparison of the sample preparation methods for each technique. Each technique's specific advantages and limitations are discussed in detail, highlighting their unique capabilities in characterizing the hydrogel structures. We illustrate this study with two semisynthetic hydrogels, such as gelatin methacrylate and hyaluronic acid methacrylate. Moreover, we delve into the critical sample preparation steps necessary for each method, emphasizing the need to preserve the hydrogel's native state while obtaining high-resolution images. This comparative analysis aims to select the most suitable electron microscopy technique for their hydrogel studies, fostering deeper insights into the design and development of advanced biomaterials for tissue engineering applications.

Identifiers

PMID40290944
PMCPMC12019757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.