Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290871›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Virtual patient simulation in an interactive educational module on intimate partner violence: nursing students' experiences-a mixed-methods study.

Joachim Eckerström, Sophie Mårtensson, Margaretha Larsson, Rajna Knez, Madeleine Ljudvåg, Samir El Alaoui, Karin Dahlström, Ylva Elvin Nowak, Terese Stenfors, Nitya Jayaram-Lindström and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Joachim Eckerström *Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sophie Mårtensson *Institution of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
Margaretha LarssonInstitution of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
Rajna KnezInstitution of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
Madeleine LjudvågInstitution of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden.
Samir El AlaouiCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin DahlströmAcademic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ylva Elvin NowakAcademic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Terese StenforsDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nitya Jayaram-LindströmCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marianne KristianssonCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden.
Uno ForsDepartment of Computer and Systems Sciences (DSV), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolina SörmanCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple studies have shown that healthcare professionals often feel uncertain about when to inquire about intimate partner violence (IPV), the appropriate methods for doing so, and how to respond to the answers. Virtual patient (VP) cases are an interactive educational tool that can be effective for learning and training clinical reasoning skills. However, there is a lack of research on the use of VP in psychiatry education. This study aimed to investigate nursing students' experiences of using a VP as part of an educational module, integrated into their foundational training on IPV during their nursing education. Methods: The study employed a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data. Participants ( Results: The VP platform was considered user-friendly and easy to navigate, although some participants found the instructions challenging. Participants perceived the VP as beneficial for learning about IPV and for practicing interactive patient dialogues. They appreciated the rich set of questions and the feedback provided, both by the experts in the field of IVP and by the VP itself. However, some participants noted that interacting with a VP on a screen was less emotional compared to real human interactions. Conclusion: The interactive educational module, integrated into the regular nursing program, was positively received by the students. Overall, the VP was considered beneficial for learning about IPV, easy to navigate, and provided a valuable opportunity for practice.

Indexed as

digital health educationdigitalizationintimate partner violencemental healthnursing studentsonline learningsimulation-based learningvirtual patient simulation

Identifiers

PMID40290871
PMCPMC12021813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.